An argument directed at envy persuades by triggering resentment or comparison instead of evaluating the truth or fairness of a claim. It is often used to delegitimize policies or people because “others have more”.
Example
“We should not support this proposal: it only benefits those who already have privileges.”
(The proposal is not evaluated on its actual merits.)
Applied example (political)
“If that company does well, it must be because it exploits; it cannot be efficient.”
(Envy is used to invalidate the explanation.)
Applied example (mystical)
“That author sells a lot; it must be just marketing.”
(Success is used as a reason for dismissal.)
Why it is fallacious
- It shifts the focus from evidence to envy.
- It treats inequality as proof of falsehood or injustice without analysis.
- It replaces reasoning with emotional comparison.
How to spot it
- Appeals to “they have” or “they enjoy” as the main argument.
- No assessment of the real effects of the proposal.
- Resentment is used to close discussion.
How to respond
- Ask for evidence about concrete effects.
- Separate moral sentiment from empirical validation.
- Weigh costs and benefits, not just perceptions.