The accentuation fallacy alters meaning by shifting emphasis or highlighting only part of a statement. It is common in headlines, social media, and propaganda.
Example
“I support X, as long as it is convenient”
(Depending on emphasis, it can imply real support or a strict condition.)
Applied example (political)
“We defend freedom, with limits.”
(Emphasis shifts from support to ambiguity.)
Applied example (mystical)
“I believe in healing, when there is faith.”
(Emphasis changes whether faith is a condition or a guarantee.)
Why it is fallacious
- It manipulates interpretation without changing the words.
- It allows denial later by shifting emphasis.
- It functions as strategic ambiguity.
How to spot it
- Meaning changes when different words are stressed.
- Headlines highlight one clause and omit the rest.
- Repetition with opposite emphasis.
How to respond
- Ask for the full sentence and context.
- Restate clearly: “only if” vs “it is assumed”.
- Point out that emphasis does not change facts.
Fallacies
Spot fallacies in seconds
Try the AI fallacy detector on speeches, texts, or documents.